The Rybal’s interpretation was a wonderful lead in to your very important concluding point. As this debate unfolds, it is useful for us remember that we too were “undesirable” immigrants at the turn of the last century, doing the work others care not to do.
But at the same time, your first explanation seems the more likely one, if I many (as has occurred before) disagree.
A question: You referred to Jacob as a Cananite and as coming from the land of Israel.
I assume there was a reason for the different usages. Would you please elucidate?
January 14th, 2010 at 1:10 am
The Rybal’s interpretation was a wonderful lead in to your very important concluding point. As this debate unfolds, it is useful for us remember that we too were “undesirable” immigrants at the turn of the last century, doing the work others care not to do.
But at the same time, your first explanation seems the more likely one, if I many (as has occurred before) disagree.
A question: You referred to Jacob as a Cananite and as coming from the land of Israel.
I assume there was a reason for the different usages. Would you please elucidate?